Below I make a few predictions, derived from the
assumption that human Intelligence is not the final word in evolution. Most people
agree with this assumption, yet keep on imagining our future without taking it
into account. Well, I do. And over the years I came to some startling
conclusions.
For example:
- Startrek
movie like space ships, will remain just that - a movie.
- Humans, visiting in person other solar system, will never happen. (Never mind colonizing the entire galaxy.)
- Humans, visiting in person other solar system, will never happen. (Never mind colonizing the entire galaxy.)
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Life arises all over the Universe, whenever a handful of basic conditions are met.
2. The universe as we known it, is teeming with life (as we know it).
2. The universe as we known it, is teeming with life (as we know it).
3. After life arises, Intelligent life is a given
and not a special case.
4. Evolution by natural selection is
UNIVERSAL !
5. Civilizations arise naturally, whenever individual Intelligence has passed a certain threshold.
6. Because of the astronomical distances involved
(Space and Time) and the exponential increase in development, almost all
civilisations will proceed to some incomprehensible, 'next level’ of intelligence, before they are able to notice
one another. From their point of view, when a civilisation is at about our
level of development, the universe seems to be there "just for them".
7. Intelligence is the ultimate and most important criteria of classification of any civilisation, anywhere in the universe. In essence, the deciding factor is the speed at which the level of intelligence is envolving within a civilization. Basically there are only two developmental stages:
a) Natural -very slow (Static) - Intelligence on Earth right now.
b) Non natural -very fast (Dynamic) - Intelligence on Earth in the 22nd Century???
a) Natural -very slow (Static) - Intelligence on Earth right now.
b) Non natural -very fast (Dynamic) - Intelligence on Earth in the 22nd Century???
How did I arrive to these conclusions? Before I start, I want to mention one peculiar observation I made:
Most people (some really clever ones too) try to
solve this (future) problem (let's say 22 century) with past thinking methods
(20th century or 19th or 16th for that matter).
Now let's check some sobering facts:
Even if the nearest star system harbors a civilization technologically similarly advanced to ours, there is no way of knowing about it. By human standards, even among the closest neighbours, the distances involved are truly enormous!
Even if the nearest star system harbors a civilization technologically similarly advanced to ours, there is no way of knowing about it. By human standards, even among the closest neighbours, the distances involved are truly enormous!
1. On the one
hand, the best radio receivers are just about able to receive a radio signal
from a distance of 1 light-year. The nearest star system is more than 4x
further away! Yes, we are transmitting electro-magnetic waves in all directions
and for over 100-years but most of this waves are beamed by the atmosphere back
to Earth. The ones which make it thru are so feeble and scattered, they barely
reach the moon. We got used to seeing pictures from Mars and even as far away
as Pluto but unless you are into data transmission over huge distances, you
have absolutely NO CLUE what it takes to make it work. See it as a miracle and
leave it there. (Nevermind distances measured in lightyears or parsec)
2. On the
other hand, lays the ever increasing speed at which civilizations evolve.
Because scientific development is building on itself (future advancement is
laid on previous foundations), the entire technological evolution, is
exponential. At our level of development this is insignificant and most people
(some really clever one too), fail to realize the future impact such a
development process will have. But in another 50 to 100 years the situation
will be different. Vastly different. Exponential functions are extremely
difficult to see or even notice, unless you have a glimpse of the inflection
point! Now this sets an upper time limit to any civilization trying to contact
another by electro-magnetic waves. (The lower limit is set by the discovery of
the radio waves themselves).
What I am saying is, in reality there is a very
short "window of opportunity" when two civilizations can
"see" each other. Actually, in practice it might turn out that the
window is non-existent! In other words, the inflection point of the
evolutionary exponential curve happens before the technology
is sufficiently advanced to make communication possible. And this
scenario is the one I put my money on. Therefore, I think that the
universe is teaming with (intelligent) life as we know it, yet from our point
of view, we and all the other civilizations out there, are absolutely
alone - for all eternity.
Herewith I, Mario Butoi predict that us humans
will find in the coming decades indisputable signs of life all over the galaxy yet the chance of finding life at our Intelligence level (or higher) is extremely low – never mind communicating and interacting with it. And exactly the same applies the other way around.
In conclusion - Here is the extract originally submitted as a letter to Scientific American, June 17, 2000 in response to Where Are They?
July 2000
Proposition: - The transcedental solution to the Fermi Paradox -
In conclusion - Here is the extract originally submitted as a letter to Scientific American, June 17, 2000 in response to Where Are They?
July 2000
Proposition: - The transcedental solution to the Fermi Paradox -
"The simplistic response to Fermi's paradox is that industrial civilizations inevitably self-destruct. Ian Crawford points out that it is improbable that all civilizations would do this, and that even one persistent industrial civilization should provide us with evidence of its existence. There is, however an answer to this paradox other than inevitable industrial self-destruction. It is a more plausible solution, but not necessarily a more pleasant one. It may be that once the drive to intelligence begins, it develops an irresistible dynamic[1]. Consider the time intervals required to produce multicellular organisms (quite long), then basic processing (insects), social processing (reptiles), social communication (mammals), spoken language (human primates), writing/reading[2], and then computing. At each step in this processing curve the time intervals to the next inflection shrink. There is no reason to assume that the curve stops with us. There may be only a few hundred years between industrial civilization and silicon/nanonic processing. Beyond that speculation is impossible; non-organic minds would operate on qualitatively different timescales from ours. Vinge, Joy, Kurzweil and others describe this as the Singularity (see Links). It may be that the kinds of civilizations we might communicate with typically exist only for a few hundred years. During their short existence they produce only the kinds of radio output that we produce. In other words, they are very short-lived and the radio output is in the "dark" area of the SETI exploration space. With intense study we may detect one or two of our fellow organic civilizations in the short time that we have left -- perhaps within the next 50 to 100 years. We may even be able to see their radio emissions go silent; replaced by the uninterpretable communications of silicon minds. Shortly before our emissions do the same thing." |